why do i not have high sierra macbook air

It makes surfing just a much cleaner experience. It feels faster, and auto-play blocking is a great feature.

More importantly though, Safari 11 is just so much better. However, I suspect one thing that helps is the way Apple designed the animations and stuff in High Sierra, which gives the illusion of faster speed. Part of it is due to the memory, since the 2.0 GHz aluminum unibody has 1067 MHz DDR3 whereas the 2.4 GHz white MacBook has 667 MHz DDR2. Both had 4 GB RAM, and both had the exact same SSD (which is an old Kingston V+100 128 GB). My 8 GB + SSD 2.26 GHz machine is better obviously, but 4 GB is OK, as long as you have SSD.īTW, although the white MacBook this replaces had a 20% faster CPU (2.4 GHz T8300 35 Watt vs 2.0 GHz P7350 25 Watt), the 2.0 GHz with High Sierra 10.13 feels more responsive with light usage than the 2.4 GHz with 10.7 Lion with light usage. Along with the hardware upgrades, now that we have a modern OS on it, I suspect we'll be able to get a good several years out of the machine, as a secondary surfing, Netflix, email, and recipe machine. 4 GB RAM and SSD made all the difference.

It was complete crap, impossible to do anything productive, or even surf. I should note that the machine came with 2 GB RAM and a HD, and it was totally unusable with its Yosemite install. Photos 3 gets a fair upgrade in High Sierra. I didn't bother installing Photoshop CS6, because for very basic usage, Photos 3 is sufficient. Safari 11's auto-play blocking makes for a more pleasant and faster surfing experience. Page rendering can be slow at times, but otherwise it's reasonable. Installed 4 GB RAM and SSD I happened to have, and it actually runs High Sierra (installed with a patched installer) reasonably well. I picked up a used MacBook5,1 - late 2008 unibody aluminum 2.0 GHz - for cheap. I posted this in the unsupported Macs for High Sierra thread, but I thought some of you might appreciate it here.

Why do i not have high sierra macbook air